One platform for your whole organization, with unlimited users, quoted as a single annual figure shaped to you. An EVP only works when everyone is in it, so charging you for adoption would defeat the point.
Unlimited, always
Your organization, not your seat count
One annual figure, quoted for you
Both tiers give your whole organization access. The difference is how much of the loop you run: activating an employer brand on a real evidence base, or building and running the living EVP underneath it.
Run evidence-based employer brand activations, reputation monitoring and hiring content, grounded in a real evidence base rather than a positioning document.
What you run"We know what we stand for. We need to activate it properly, everywhere, and see how it lands."
Everything in Activation, plus the living, measured EVP underneath it: the research that builds it, the measurement that keeps it honest, and the advisory that acts on it.
Everything in Activation, plus"We are not sure our EVP is still true, and we want to know, keep knowing, and act on it."
You can start with Activation and move up. Plenty of organizations activate first and build the measured EVP once they have seen where the evidence points. Nothing you create in Activation is lost when you do.
Why Here is infrastructure you run your employer brand on, so it is priced like infrastructure rather than a content subscription. Four principles hold, whichever tier you choose.
Every employee, manager, recruiter and advocate, with no per-seat cost. An EVP built from employee voice and lived through manager moments needs those people inside the platform, so we do not put a price on letting them in.
How large you are and how many employer brands you run shape the figure. That means it tracks the scope of the work rather than how many people happen to log in this month.
A single annual agreement, scoped in a conversation and set for the year. No usage metering, no overage invoices, and no clause that punishes you for the platform being used well.
Dedicated isolation, single sign-on and directory sync, audit and the full governance posture are part of the platform on both tiers. See Trust and security for how each of those works.
Charging per seat would mean charging you to include the people whose voices make the EVP true.
A walkthrough on realistic demo data shows you how the platform finds where an employer brand is breaking, what is driving the gaps, and what it advises doing next. You can judge the thing itself before any figure is discussed.
It is also the most useful way to have the pricing conversation, because by then we are both talking about the same work rather than a feature list.
A walkthrough on realistic demo data, so you can judge the platform before committing to anything.
How large you are, how many employer brands you run, and how much of the loop you want to operate.
Which tier fits the work, based on your organization rather than a rate card.
A single figure for the year, with your whole organization included from day one.
Because the figure is shaped to your organization rather than pulled off a rate card. Two companies with similar headcounts can have very different scope, depending on how many employer brands they run and how much of the loop they want to operate.
A published number would either overstate what a smaller organization needs or understate what a group of brands actually involves. Quoting properly takes one conversation and produces a figure that reflects your value rather than an average.
No. Users are unlimited on both tiers. You are never charged for adoption, and there is no seat count to manage, forecast or true up.
That is deliberate rather than generous. The platform depends on employees contributing evidence, managers acting on advice and advocates sharing content, so a per-seat model would price out the very behaviour that makes it work.
Activation runs your employer brand on an evidence base: activations, hiring, advocacy, reputation, content and governance.
Full EVP adds the living EVP underneath it: the research that builds it, regional and per-audience variants, the measured gap between what you promise and what people experience, and the intelligent advisory that acts on it. Activation is the way in. Full EVP is the whole system.
Yes, and many organizations do. Start with Activation and move to Full EVP once you have seen what the evidence says. Everything you build in Activation carries forward.
Included, on both tiers. Dedicated isolation per customer, single sign-on and directory sync, the audit trail and the governance model are part of the platform rather than an enterprise add-on.
The full detail, including data residency and how AI governance works, is on Trust and security.
A short conversation to understand your organization and its brands, evidence-based scoping to agree which tier fits the work, then a single annual agreement. No procurement theatre, and no self-serve checkout, because this is not a product you should be buying without talking to us.
No, on both counts. A half-configured EVP platform would tell you nothing useful about your own organization, so there is no self-serve tier to sign up for. The walkthrough is the honest equivalent: you see the platform working on realistic data, with someone who can answer the awkward questions, before any commitment exists.
A short conversation about your organization and its brands, a walkthrough of the platform on realistic data, then a single annual figure quoted for you. No rate card, no per-seat math, and no checkout.